Aaradhya Textile Industry Aaradhya Textile Industry

Metask and Crypto.com: an annoying transaction

As a digital currency enthusiast, I recently found an unusual problem with the metamark wallet and its connection to the Crypto.com exchange platform. The problem began when I tried to send a PEPE currency (PEP currency) from the metamark portfolio to Crypto.com Ethereum (ETH). What followed was a confusing result that allows me to think if something didn’t work well.

Here is as happened:

The mystery deepens

Metamask: I sent pepe from MetaMask to crypto.com

As I deepen the problem, I discovered two different results:

* The Crypto.com website the quantity and other details were accurate.

* ETHERUMSCAN : Instead, when I checked Ethereumscan (a popular blockchain explorer on the web), there was no evidence that the PEP currency be deposited in my eths wallet.

Possible reasons behind the problem

There are several possible reasons why this transaction may not be working as expected:

3.

Conclusion

This experience highlights the importance of double verification and verification information before starting transactions. I hope this incident will serve as a history of caution to those who deal with metamans, Crypto.com and Ethereumscan to exercise extreme care when performing on -line transactions.

It is always better to check the hips of the wallet, confirm the details of the transaction and ensure that all parties involved are aware of the transaction status.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *